Saturday, March 01, 2008

Housing

We've been giving some thought to our next house. Its still a long ways off, but I think we're both a little shell-shocked by the prices that houses are going for around here, and we feel that we need to move, at least a little, from just thinking about it to actually doing something. Its not really clear if there is a definite first step -- if you're buying a house, its pretty obvious -- you look for one thats at least generally acceptable, and then you see if it can be made more acceptable. Landscaping, painting, whatever. If you're more thinking of building, we feel that you probably need to start with a general sense of what it is that you want to do, and then you go looking for a place to do it. On the other hand, I've heard several people say that they started by finding a place, and letting the place determine what they would do. I don't know -- but whichever, we probably ought to start.

This isn't to say that we've given up on the idea of modifying this house to have enough characteristics and capabilities that we can simply stay here forever -- as might be expected form people who essentially got one job and stayed with it their entire lives, we both have no real problem with staying in this house, the first one we ever bought. But there are a number of things that we'd like to improve about it; some of them can be done easily, some with difficulty, and some (despite the words of one local architect about houses being essentially plastic) really can't. Putting additional lighting into the garage and storage room falls into the first category; putting in an elevator into the second; having the kitchen right next to the garage falls squarely into the third. (Though if the elevator was on a direct path from the garage to the kitchen...maybe. Maybe. )

In going to the Pennsylvania Home Builders Expo, we came away with the feeling that its not as important what a house looks like, barren, as it does once its furnished. In some regards, we want a standard house -- about two thousand square feet, two bedrooms (one quite large), two baths -- but in others, we don't -- its important to us that it have sufficient (even excessive) sound insulation; we want an extra water source for drenching showers even while the dishwasher and washing machine are running ; we want above average carpetting; we'd like a whole-house air conditioner/heater/humidifier; we want a tray ceiling in the dining room; we'd like a clerestory ceiling in the living room -- but its more important, once the basics are met, to have a home that exudes a sense of warmth and comfort. We want this house to feel welcoming, and we think that the way that its decorated is what will make that possible.

There's a couple of pictures I have that I like to look at because they have that feeling, even if they're not exactly what we have in mind --



The first is larger than we'd want, but it has the right feel; the second is about the right size, but its more formal than we have in mind.

Its a start.

5 comments:

Unknown said...

Can I suggest Susan Susanka's work on residential architecture? She wrote the "Not So Big" series of books (published by Taunton Press).

While they likely won't change your requirements, what they can do is help you better define what you're looking for. And recognizing it when you see it!

The way they helped was in the little things - being able to better define the requirements. Of course, it didn't help us remember some of our requirements, which we totally forgot when it came to actually buying. For instance, we totally forgot central air and heating - I have no idea how it happened, but it did. (Now, I have the chance to develop some ideas about them... Who says euphemisms aren't useful?!? :-) )

When we looked, it was the opposite market - nothing was for sale, and what there was didn't amount to much. And it was more expensive than it should have been. Now, there are plenty of houses available - but nobody seems to be buying! (The number of houses around here that have "Reduced!" on them is actually quite shocking. And it seems I see more and more with "For Sale".)

Good luck with it all!

Carolyn Ann

Unknown said...

Sarah Susanka, not Susan!

Something didn't seem quite right, so I googled her. She's at Susanka.com.

Oops!
Carolyn Ann

Cerulean Bill said...

Ah, yes, I've read her stuff -- or as I like to refer to it, The Not So Very Inexpensive House. I think she's got some good ideas, but I also think some of them are trendy ones that don't stand the test of time or usage. For example, the idea that you want long sightlines to 'make the house feel bigger'... but you also want to break up spaces into usable space rather than one big box. For the longest time, I liked (before I actually saw) the book -- argh, the name just escaped me, but its the one that says you build a house by first describing the requirements of the house. The terms that they use sounded very much to me like artificial intelligence phrasings. Ah, got it -- A Pattern Language. Then I actually found the book, and thought What the heck is This? Because it turned out that the house part was just a little bitty part of it -- they were talking about houses, villages, cities, traffic flow, all of that. Still good stuff, but not applicable to what I wanted. Well, not HUGELY applicable. But thats how I think of building -- what are the requirements, whats key, all of that.

Yesterday, remembering the comment of a friend years ago to the effect that you buy a house to fix the defects of the last one, I thought 'we have to write down what we don't like, and learned to live with, and what we DO like, and want in the next house. Going to be tough -- those nubs of memory have gotten worn smooth.'

Gotta go add central heat to my list.

Unknown said...

" you buy a house to fix the defects of the last one" Oh, yeah. I know that one.

We targeted newer houses, simply because our old one was, well, really old. Now, I'm not so sure I argued for the right choice; it's a nice house, but it sure lacks character! Ah well - something else to add.

Carolyn Ann

Cerulean Bill said...

Character...character...nope, got no houses wit' dat. You want shag carpets?